Note:1648 IMHO. The register has 1649 starting in March - as was the way the calendar worked then, so 6 F…
1648 IMHO. The register has 1649 starting in March - as was the way the calendar worked then, so 6 Feb 1648
The origianl entry here was from the IGI and incorrectly (in my view) had decided it was 1649
